What is the main idea of this article?
I think that main idea is author want to talk about how to manage any conflicts, especially finding solution of ritual fighting between individual and people, community or villages, cultures. Although Americans think disputes should be settled by without interference, the author suggest to look at the other cultures where people believe third party is important to resolve conflicts so that they may find new way to manage conflicts.
- How does the author use examples; are they effective, in your opinion?
The author first used examples which show intermediaries are important in some cultures and then talked about cultures where don’t involve third party. In my opinion, these examples are effective because we can see difference how does third party impact to manage conflicts in different situations.
What is the most effective example, in your opinion?
Cockfighting in Bali, for example, is very effective example I think. This example helps to understand that what Americans think individual choice and consequence is inseparable from complex social network in other culture.
- How does the structure of the article support the development of the main idea?
The writer of this article used examples of different cultures to support the main idea and she separated each country’s example by different subtitle. In addition to that she explained how do all these examples related to the main idea as well.